
Fox News has confirmed that Congressman Dan Boren, the only Democrat in the Oklahoma delegation , said yesterday in an interview, that he will not endorse Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee for president because he is" the most liberal senator in the U.S. Senate". Boren, running for re-election, said that he had to reflect the views of the 2nd district of Oklahoma, a mostly rural area.The majority of his constituents voted for Senator Clinton during that state's presidential primary.
Boren also criticized Obama for having a record" that does no reflect working in a bipartisan fashion."However, Boren did state that he would vote for Obama as the nominee for the Democratic party at their convention in August.
Fox News has confirmed that Congressman Dan Boren, the only Democrat in the Oklahoma delegation , said yesterday in an interview, that he will not endorse Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee for president because he is" the most liberal senator in the U.S. Senate".
Then Boren is an idiot. That's not a political opinion, it's a fact. He's an idiot.
Congressman Boren, I'd like to introduce you to the Junior Senator from Vermont, Bernie Sanders (S-VT).
"S?" You might ask. What does this "S" stand for? Senator Sanders is a self described socialist. He's an honest-to-god socialist and he is, in fact, a member of the United States Senate.
So we have Senator Barack Obama... who is not, in fact, a socialist. And we have Senator Bernie Sanders who... is.
Now who's the most liberal senator of the U.S. Senate?
I thought so.
Boren also criticized Obama for having a record" that does no reflect working in a bipartisan fashion."However, Boren did state that he would vote for Obama as the nominee for the Democratic party at their convention in August.
Sound like political double talk to me.
Killfile, I've never been able to make a non-blockquote quote like you've got up there. How did you do it?
Sounds to me like Bernie Sanders (along with a herd of Vermonters) is the idiot, not Dan Boren.
SteveHouse: <q>Your quotation here</q>
Lazarus: You can disagree with Bernie all you like, but Dan's the one who's to daft to realize that we've got an honest to God socialist sitting in the Senate which does rather preclude Obama being "the most liberal senator."
"S?" You might ask. What does this "S" stand for? Senator Sanders is a self described socialist. He's an honest-to-god socialist and he is, in fact, a member of the United States Senate.
You're missing the forest for the trees. Who cares if there's someone more "left" than Obama? Do you deny that Obama is left? Do you further deny that he is much further left than the majority of Oklahomans? You can nitpick all you want, but it doesn't change the facts on the ground. Anyway, wasn't the Democratic party supposed to be a Big Tent? Or are some big tents more big tent than others?
You're missing the forest for the trees. Who cares if there's someone more "left" than Obama?
Congressman Dan Boren of Oklahoma obviously does. Or did you not notice that that's who the article is about?
Do you deny that Obama is left?
It may astonish you to learn that the world does not always resolve itself into black and white. Obama is fairly centrist as the candidates go.
Do you further deny that he is much further left than the majority of Oklahomans?
I think that's up to Oklahomans -- not that the Democratic party is on the edge of its seat to see where they'll vote.
You can nitpick all you want, but it doesn't change the facts on the ground
And the facts on the ground are that Dan Boren is idiotically repeating a Republican talking point that's not just wrong it's demonstrably false and obviously so. He could as credibly be claiming that the sky is maroon.
Anyway, wasn't the Democratic party supposed to be a Big Tent? Or are some big tents more big tent than others?
You let me know how that Big Tent works out for the Libertarians and the Christian Conservatives will ya?
Do you deny that Obama is left?
What definition of "left" encompasses:
- supporting the PATRIOT Act?
- wanting to expand a military that already spends more than half the world's defense budget?
- building a giant fence along your country's border?
- protecting corporations limiting people's ability to file class action lawsuits?
- repeatedly voting to fund an illegal occupation?
Obama is guilty of all the acts I've listed here.
Congressman Dan Boren of Oklahoma obviously does. Or did you not notice that that's who the article is about?
No, he cares that Obama is the nominee and is too left for his constituency. "Or did you not notice that's what the article is about?" **scoff**
Obama is fairly centrist as the candidates go.
Which candidates, and what does that have to do with Boren's constituency, exactly, other than what we already know - Obama is to the left of it?
I think that's up to Oklahomans -- not that the Democratic party is on the edge of its seat to see where they'll vote.
Exactly. I'm not pretending Boren matters to Obama - so why is anyone else? But I'm also not pretending that Boren's wrong in his assessment, as far as Oklahoma goes.
And the facts on the ground are that Dan Boren is idiotically repeating a Republican talking point that's not just wrong it's demonstrably false and obviously so. He could as credibly be claiming that the sky is maroon.
Hey, if you want to attack him, go for it; seriously I don't know why you care. The facts on the ground are that Obama is too far to the left for most Oklahomans. You know - the ones Boren represents. He's not looking to get Obama elected, obviously - he's looking to keep his job by not getting painted in the broad brush of those very Republican talking points you mention. And I don't blame him.
You let me know how that Big Tent works out for the Libertarians and the Christian Conservatives will ya?
Yeah, I don't even know what you mean by that. The Democrats have repeatedly claimed to be Big Tent - I didn't pull that out of the air. Hell, they picked up seats because of it, last go-round, fielding moderate and moderate-to-conservative Democratic candidates. But now they have to suddenly turn around and toe the party line, thereby betraying their constituency and making a lie of their campaign stances? The Big Tent is apparently just an illusion. How long do you suppose it'll last?
I think that's up to Oklahomans -- not that the Democratic party is on the edge of its seat to see where they'll vote.
From an Okie: Obama is to the left of at least 85% of us. Don't let our Democratic governor fool you. Sadly, I know several people who take his middle name and his lapel pin very seriously. For example:
My girlfriend: See, look there, he's wearing your flag pin.
My girlfriend's dad: Yeah, fer whut country!?
Thanks for the quoting tip! :D
The Obama campaign did not waste time in countering Boren.
Sounds like Boren's shooting himself in the foot.
Sounds like a politician. ;-)
Trust me, Boren isn't shooting anyone in the foot. Oklahoma voted 2-1 in favor of Clinton and is one of the reddest states around.
Sounds like Boren's shooting himself in the foot.
If he were running nationally you'd probably be right. But in Oklahoma he's doing right by his constituents - although he is admittedly doing it in a grandstanding sort of showboat way. But that's politics, I guess.
Good for him. The Obamistas ignore reality. 18,000,000 voters for Clinton should demonstrate a reality to the Obamistas: there are people in the Party who aren't ultra liberals. That's what Obama is. If this were left to these 36,000,000 +people (add in the votes for everyone else), and perhaps Obama comes out with the Edwards folks, but I think Dodd and Biden, for two, have some Centrist views on the Iraq War, for instance, or foreign policy, in general. Ron Paul got a healthy turn out. He remains a potent inspiration to Libertarians, who rarely swing Liberal. There are the Huckabee's and the Romney's too. None of them are going to vote for Obama in the general election. Ultra Liberal Elitist Democrats think that people will move Left. I don't think so. I think they will stay in the center. Missouri, which was early in the race, was a near dead heat, with Obama winning by 1%. That was before Rev. Wright and "K.K.K., America" and "God DAMN" America!"; the ex-communist blogger; Michelle and Barack's remarks about class; small town America; "down right mean America." Larry Johnson's Blog, NO QUARTER indicates that he has it from "four sources" that a Michelle Obama anti-white rant exists on video and that the GOP will use it. Obama will only give the Republican attack machine something to roll on the floor and pee their pants laughing about, if he rails against attacks against his wife. If he doesn't want her attacked, he should give her a script, as Senator Clinton ultimately had to do with Bill; take her off the campaign trail; or, take the heat. Once she begins campaigning for Barack, she's an open target. Those folks and many "centrists" of the Democrat Party don't feel they're represented. The ULE's think that Clinton's MORTAL, unforgiveable sin, was voting to give Bush authority to go to war. Obama wasn't even IN the Senate when that vote was taken, yet he acts like he was. He wasn't. So, his comments about being against the war are fine, but don't carry much weight. I feel Senator Clinton's record since that vote is indicative of a mature reality on global politics. If Obama's trip to Pakistan is fully investigated, there will be more losses for him in the national total. People will come out of the woodwork to vote against him. I don't know if that will mean votes for McCain, but there are many centrist Democrats, and they are a part of the party. Else, why 18,000,000 votes for Clinton. The Ultra Liberals cannot take the entire country. If only several million of us write Senator Clinton's name in, Obama can't win. And, for some of us, that means we have choices which will send a powerful signal. We can vote for other Democrats, and stack the Congress. Until Senator Clinton's debt is paid off, I have no intention of even looking at a Democrat plea for dough. Barack Obama never showed me he can't close the deal. He got as many votes (nearly), as Clinton, and he surely persuaded delegates but I don't believe he will win the November election. If the Democrats want to commit political suicide again, that's their decision. I now call myself an Indepenent. With Dr. Dean, Donna Brazille, et al, in the power pole position in the Democrat Party, I don't feel at home any longer. Just call me a centrist.
Can we have a serious debate? These idiotic terms like "Obamite," "Obama Land," "Obamista" (stupidest one thus far), etc. are really getting old.
Oklahoma politics are truly pathetic. Usually, your winner is the most ultraconservative theocrat in the barrel. Case in point: Sally "homosexuality is a bigger threat than terrorism" Kern. (I hope I get the chance to cup-o-fart that bigot before I die.) The worst part is that the adults here usually agree with the views of the fascists.
Wow. It's OK to talk about people from Oklahoma like they're re-tards. It's OK to criticize someone because he's expressing an opinion that reflects that of the people who elected him. Wow.
I agree with Killfile that what passes for "left" in the US is pretty centrist, relative to other western democracies. However, K.F., Boren did not "dream up" the label. From NPR, Jan 2008:
The National Journal is out with its 27th Annual vote ratings and it ranked Sen. Barack Obama as the most liberal Senator in the entire Senate. (His first year he was 16th, and last year he was 10th.) But he wasn't alone in his shift to the left. Sen. Hillary Clinton was 16th herself in 2007 after being 32nd in 2006.
And there really wasn't much room between them. The Journal notes of the 267 measures on which both senators cast votes in 2007, the two differed on only 10.
The ranking can sometimes be used as a weapon by opponents. In 2004 Republicans used Sen. John Kerry's liberal rankings against him.
Oh I know he didn't dream it up. The National Journal put it out there. I am suspicious of them though, particularly at the ends of the spectrum and find that their rankings are historically influenced by notoriety... oftentimes more than actual voting histories and even ignoring the complexities of a senate vote.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |