
A new poll released Tuesday found that most people believe the media's treatment of the women involved in the presidential campaign this year was highly sexist, and that Sarah Palin was not only treated far worse by the press than Joe Biden, but she was also covered much more harshly than Hillary Clinton.
"The Daily Beast" poll also found that very few women consider themselves to be feminist, with a virtually equal minority wishing that a current or future daughter would become a feminist.
Here are some of the interesting highlights:
Lead me to a comment, made by Palin that was not either a:
a) rambling syntax monster challenging the best and brightest to decipher its meaning.
b) a base character attack.
c) an over-repeated talking point.
OR
d) all of the above.
Do that and I will concede your point.
You do realize that Obama is quoted as stating that there are 57 states?
Thats fine shaun, yes obama has some gaffe. should we compare the number to Palinspeak? and I think he was talking about all the territories that can vote, but I'll concede that one to you.
You do realize that Obama is quoted as stating that there are 57 states?
Is that your final answer?
Or would you like to use a life-line to call a friend?
I guess you don't realize the irony of the error in relation to the complaint in your own post.
Do you need to call a friend, or do you want a lifeline?
Nevermind, I guess you already gave yourself a pass.
57 was the number of primaries & caucuses. Woops!
But you haven't answered my question? Can you show me a comment made by Palin that would not warrent greater scrutiny by the press or the public? Most everything she has said falls into the categories I listed.
But you haven't answered my question?
And you haven't answered mine.
Did you run out of lifelines or friends?
You do realize that Obama is quoted as stating that there are 57 states?
He was talking about states he had visited and it's pretty obvious he meant to say 47, meaning all of the lower 48 except one, plus AK and HI. It all makes sense if you listen to the clip in its entirety.
Either way, he is not quoted as saying there are 57 states. He was only referring to states he had visited, which were all but three states. So, even if you take his words at face value and do all the math, he is actually indicating that he thinks there are 60 states, not 57.
Ok, I'll answer your question. Yes, I have heard that quote referred to but I have never seen or heard the actual quote.
Your turn. Please provide a quote by Sarah Palin that is not an attack, a campaign talking point or an incomprehensible mess.
He was talking about states he had visited
Sigh! Do you really believe that?
Sigh! Do you really believe that?
What's to believe? That's what he said. Google "57 states" and listen carefully if you want to watch the clip and find out what he really said.
Yes. We all know about the teflon explanation. So?
The vidio is not an explanation of what he said. It is the source of the misquote. I'm done arguing about this. Good luck.
Here's what Obama said...fresh from the LA times. Oops!
"It is wonderful to be back in Oregon," Obama said. "Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it."
The Times' conscientious Robin Abcarian thought she heard something different there. She checked her tape recorder. It had captured what he had actually said -- 57 states now. A new Louisiana Purchase that's gone unannounced so far? Was he channeling his inner John Kerry-Heinz 57 personality?
(UPDATE: At a later stop Obama was talking with reporters and expressed concern he'd also mis-stated the number of potential cyclone victims in Burma. He said, ""I hope I said 100,000 people the first time instead of 100 million. I understand I said there were 57 states today. It's a sign that my numeracy is getting a little, uh." At that point, an aide cut him off and ushered journalists out. Before he could mis-speak again?)
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/05/barack-obama-wa.html
I think it's obvious he meant 47. Do you really believe he thinks there are 57 states? Wait....why am I asking you? Of course you truly believe that. You know he's also a terrorist. Oh, and bravo for staying on topic.
Yes. We all know the obvious excuse that was chosen.
Yea, I've never seen the quote but it's more than obvious he meant 47 and he just made a mistake.
This is a stupid topic. Of course Obama knows how many states there are. Please find something of substance to argue about.
Shaun,
"57 states" is clearly your only argument. And it's not even a good one. This man had traveled the country to every state. He was passed exhausted. And he corrected himself and laughed about it later. What is Sarah's excuse? She doen't have one. She clearly needs to be educated on US History.
“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”
~Goethe~
“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”
I see we have found some common ground.
I agree with your statement.
ShaunV...I'm trying to figure out why you're so desperately trying to make Obama look stupid and trying to sway off the topic. Sarah Palin is not a smart woman. Nothing she said makes sense. If her biggest mistake was to say that Africa is a country, that wouldn't be so bad, but that was her smallest! There is no comparison!
I take no issue with fellow females unless they are vindictive or unethical.
I have many friends who don't have college degrees and who are ignorant about issues. But I have none that consistently call other people out on false or untrue things because of their own ignorance and then whine about it to Greta Van Sustern when I correct them.
So my comment was deleted why?
It's true, you are desperate to make this work because there is just not enough material to compete with against the back catalogue of someone like Palin. Is my opinion somehow more inflammatory than yours that it deserved to be deleted?
I am a feminist.
I do think the media was harsh on both Palin and Clinton.
I don't think the harshness was sexist except in a very few instances. I think the harshness was largely directed at statements made by the candidates, which is completely fair. This is a political campaign, after all.
You do realize that Obama is quoted as stating that there are 57 states?
You do realize that Palin really didn't know a thing about the Bush Doctrine, but that Obama undoubtedly knows exactly how many states there are, right? The brain/mouth malfunction thing is something we all do, almost every day - kind of like when McCain began to call himself "A proud, liberal Republican." He accidentally said another word - at least twice - but I cannot quote it here. Accidentally. And we all GET that was an accident.
Forget these little quips out of context for a moment and look at the big picture. Palin was pelted by the media because she was the most laughable VP candidate since Dan Quayle, not because she was female. Obama proved that he has intelligence, knowledge, a calm and rational demeanor, and can mentally handle concept/complex issues with ease - over and over and over again for two years. Palin came out for nine weeks and babbled.
As for Hillary, she's most definitely smart and capable, but made a few big mistakes - including the embelished Bosnia story - and DESERVED to be taken to task for that.
Obama didn't get off lightly. Muslim, terrorist, racist, socialist, communist, "frightening" associations, secret agenda, blah, blah, blah. "He's not a citizen! He's going to swear in on the Koran!" Most of this stuff was hysterical ranting with little or no factual reality. At least with Palin and Clinton, they said and did things which we all saw with our own eyes, and which deserved a second look and a lot of thought.
Same goes with McCain for his transparent ploys and theatrics. And he's a man. We women aren't going to do ourselves any good by crying foul (sexism) when we know better. Was Michelle Bachman just a little sensationalist when she called for investigations in anti-Americans in Congress? Was Elizabeth Dole not playing dirty with that "godless" stuff? Would these things not have been equally ridiculous if they had come from a man? You betcha they would, also!
Yes. We all know the obvious excuse that was chosen.
Well, what kind of excuse would you like to see, ShaunV?
Do gaffes automatically mean that (s)he who gaffes really thought what came out of her/his mouth?
If so, we can assume the following:
This is the kind of logic you use to judge Obama's words. I'm sure you have no problems with us making the above assumptions about McCain.
This is the kind of logic you use to judge Obama's words. I'm sure you have no problems with us making the above assumptions about McCain.
What you said. Not to mention that bad c-word.
W8in we can also add that Palin believes Afghanistan is a neighboring country and that McCain thinks of us all as prisoners.
But you see, I don't really believe they think those things. I suppose that's because I'm a bit more fair in my judging of the things the candidates say..
what has "57 states" to do with sexism in the media? palin is a vaccuous, intellectually devoid creature who never put two thoughts together to make a third. is that sexism? no, its plain fact! my biggest objection to her is that she has no intellectual curiosity--she doesnt want to know anything--just give me the power (and the money) and get out of my way.
Lets not forget that she's the one who called herself "a pitbull with lipstick" whose being sexist now?
Hey Shaun,
Did McCain really think that America was his "fellow Prisoners"? Did he agree that the people of PA are racist?
He slipped up and said those things, so he must really believe them, right?
Gaffes are one thing, substance is another.
Every time Palin opened her mouth, it was a gaffe. I don't think the media was as harsh as her own people were. Her own cabinet in alaska said she managed with large brush strokes and only signed on to projects at the last minute.
Her own Republican party was the ones calling her and her husband 'hillbillies from wasilla.'
Or can we forget when the GOP had their governors convention one of the gov's said aside to a colleague 'let her run in 2012, someone needs be a lamb for the slaughter.'
If you are going to blame someone for the harsh treatment of Palin, start with the GOP.
The media gave palin a pass time and time again. They asked her easy questions such as 'what does a vp do?' or 'what do you read?' Or maybe for clarifications about the 'bridge to nowhere' or how 'proximity to russia is foreign policy experience'.
They never, ever, ever asked her hard questions So if anything the media was too light on her.
Just compare the policy questions of biden, mccain, clinton, and obama to palin's questions.
IMO She should be thanking the media, they could have creamed her if they wanted to.
...I'm trying to figure out why you're so desperately trying to make Obama look stupid and trying to sway off the topic.
Obama makes himself look stupid...we're just desperate to point it out.
Sarah Palin is not a smart woman.
How many elected offices have you held?
Lets not forget that she's the one who called herself "a pitbull with lipstick" whose being sexist now?
That's not what she said but I really don't expect most Obama supporters to worry about the facts too much.
That's not what she said but I really don't expect most Obama supporters to worry about the facts too much.
Ditto for McCain supporters.
I just think that Palin was a very easy target, compared to Clinton or Biden who were both well known. Palin was never vetted so the media had to do the vetting for her. She failed miserably.
I don't think she failed.
Due to media bias, she never had a fair chance.
I am surprised to see a woman be so harsh on her, given the history of bias toward woman in all venues, in the US.
Aimee, she was vetted, she just wasn't vetted by the liberal elite media. Liberals think that she failed miserably, because they are liberals, and she is a conservative. If you look a Dick Morris's analyses, he found they she was a stronger pull then McCain.
Ryan,
It was Sarah Palin's fault that she failed. She was clearly out of her league and it's was proven everytime she opened her mouth. There were I'm sure plenty other qualified women that was better for the GOP- VP pick than Sarah Palin and they chose to over look them. Why? Only they can tell us that.
Of course they were harsher on Palin, at least Clinton had a more than adequate resume to be running for the highest position of office.
Palin doesn't have the experience or credentials required...
If you look a Dick Morris's analyses, he found they she was a stronger pull then McCain.
Good point.
Palin doesn't have the experience or credentials required...
Neither does Obama.
Dick Morris is a weasel, plain and simple. His analysis came right out of Hannity's butt crack.
ShaunV -
66.6 million voters disagree with you about his qualifications.
Also - being able to draw a crowd doesn't mean anything with respect to qualifications. Look how many folks watch pro wrestling - but do you want them (other than, perhaps Ventura) to be President or Vice-President? Using your logic we can say that Palin was more qualified than McCain since she consistently drew larger crowds.
rls8r - thank you!
and I am 1 of those 66.6 M
66.6 million voters disagree with you about his qualifications.
You seem to think that actually proves that the majority made the right decision.
The majority of people followed Rev. Jim Jones mandate to drink the Kool aid. The same fools who drank the mandated Kool aid, restrained people who resisted, and prior those who questioned jim jones were beaten by the same fools who gave children and adults the poison drink and even drank the kool aid., themselves.
What exactly was your point, again?
Shaun, are you implying that 66.6 million voters were brainwashed? Can you show us proof, or is this your opinion?
Only when you show me proof that they weren't.
comparing the election to the Jonestown massacre...
I don't know, big difference.
Shaun, are you implying that 66.6 million voters were brainwashed? Can you show us proof, or is this your opinion?
Only when you show me proof that they weren't.
Ah, yes. The typical elementary school yard argument. Well played, Shaun.
Only when you show me proof that they weren't.
LOL. What else can I expect from a guy like you?
She failed not because she was a woman, but because when she spoke, it was clear she was not ready. The media did not put those words in her mouth, she did. Now as far as turn out, it should be noted that many came or tuned in just to see if she would would embarrass herself further or actually prove the media concerns. She always proved them right. She was inadequate.
louie lou @ 2.15
Dodge noted, louie lou.
When you get some proof. Let me know. ;-)
What proof do you want me to provide? You're the one who made the analogy between Jonestown and 66.6 million voters!!! Why should I have to show any proof of anything? I'm reading your post at 3.1--- I think you're way in over your head on this issue. Nuff said. I'm out.
Louie Lou @ 2.18
Dodge noted.
Palin made herself an easy target. She allowed herself to be handled badly. She allowed herself to be dictated to. She didn't speak up and out until it was too late and we were all ready to see her disappear back to the frozen Alaskan tundra.
If you allow yourself to be led then you deserve where you end up. Period.
Her campaign sent the lamb to the Couric slaughter because 'they' thought it would be an easier interview.
So were they being sexist towards Palin? Couric? or both?
The difference between a woman like Palin and a woman like Hillary is that a woman like Palin walks in and DEMANDS attention and respect......a woman like Hillary walks into a room and COMMANDS it.
ShaunV -
Shaun, Shaun ... I'll be glad to review things for you.
First, you seeded an article about the Press being unfair to Palin;
- then you were pulled off-topic and started to discuss whether or not Palin had failed her media-vetting;
- then you went further off-topic and made a leap of logic about how Dick Morris' analysis of Palin's ability to draw crowds meant that she had the experience and credentials to be VP;
- then you went even further off-topic to state your opinion that Obama doesn't have the required experience and credentials when Bar Fly tried to re-direct the conversation back to the seeded topic;
- I then made the observation that 66.6 million voters disagree with your opinion about Obama's not having the required experience and credentials;
- You then went off on a rant about the Jonestown mass suicide - somehow drawing a comparison between the 66.6 million people that voted for Obama and the 'majority of people' (majority of what population remains unclear) that committed suicide. The last sentence of that paragraph wanders off and doesn't make sense to me, so I have to stop there - I'm not sure what you meant to say.
I can see how you lost the point of the thread. Is it starting to come back? Is this sounding familiar?
My point was that with respect to the topic of this thread - the topic that you chose - is that subjectively, it really doesn't matter what you think of Obama's credentials - objectively, it really doesn't matter if Obama has them or not. The fact remains that a majority of voters disagree with you and that after considering all the information that has been developed over a 2-year run-up to the election, whatever credentials Obama has - the majority of voters considers Obama to have credentials sufficient for the job.
Whether it was a right decision or a wrong decision remains to be seen. I, and about 66.6 million others feel we made the right decision. Regardless - I'm not going to base my opinion of Obama's credentials to be President, or even of Palin's credentials to be VP for that matter, on whether or not Palin can draw a larger crowd than McCain.
Shaun,
HAHAHA you get more delusional by the day. So it's to be assumed that 66 Million WERE brainwashed, and the opposite is what has to be proven?
Prove to me that ALL of McCain's voters didn't vote for him just because they hate black people with a violent passion.
The ball is in your court, until then, we'll just assume that EVERYONE who voted for McCain is a violent, racist terrorist who is currently planning to kill Obama this very moment. And now that there is a black president using the Patriot Act, maybe we can do something about you racist terrorists
Shaun V, I rarely disagree with the premise and opinions of the authors or articles on this site but to claim that her treatment was sexist is logically baseless. She simply is, was and may never be competent or ethical enough to hold an office that demands honesty over hubris, democracy over demagoguery and ideas over ideology. If Hillary would have acted like Sarah then the result would have been the same.
Shaun -- you state that Palin wasn't given a fair chance. She was yanked from relative obscurity two months before the election. During those two months she held exactly zero press conferences. What was unfair about the media's coverage and what could they have done to be more fair to her?
Gosh how can any compare Hillary to Palin? Or Barack to Palin? We are talking apples and oranges. Hillary and Barack are very well educated and experience in the world of our nations politics particularly Hillary she has years and years of experience. Palin knows the state of Alaska and that is where her knowledge seemed to begin and end. She mocked Obama's time spent as a community organizer and I wonder if she is still laughing? We all saw the kind of ability and leadership this guy has! Give us a break Palin not only gave the media but the comedians so much to work with she serve it up weekly.
If she was not prepared or ready she should have said no to the GOP.
Lead me to a comment, made by Palin that was not either a:
a) rambling syntax monster challenging the best and brightest to decipher its meaning.
b) a base character attack.
c) an over-repeated talking point.
OR
d) all of the above.
Do that and I will concede your point.
Do the same for Obama first.
Then enjoy these Obamoments:
America has 60 states, I've visted 57 of them..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws
Veterans are honored on Memorial Day
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR8YaR3JEkE
the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex1VvlnAmw0
I've spoken to the "living" Presidents
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1155201977?bctid=1906919424
Stuttering Fool
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc
Babbling Fool
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDJSVPAx8xc&feature=related
and finally...
J-O-B-S, a 3-letter word
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq-eeWow_WU
at least Clinton had a more than adequate resume to be running for the highest position of office.
How did sleeping with Bill Clinton and becoming JUNIOR SENATOR make a better resume than someone with 2 elected EXECUTIVE POSITIONS; Mayor, Governor on their resume?
Palin doesn't have the experience or credentials required...
Do the same for Obama first.
Typical Right-Wing Know-nothing response. "I won't answer your question, you answer mine"
You can't answer his question, because you're not informed enough.
Archon Prime.
Thank you for adding the links.
Some are quite funny. :)
Archon Prime -
Thanks - some of these are funny. The Memorial Day was a bit long, so I didn't go all the way through it. I guess I didn't stay with it long enough to catch the funny part - maybe someone should snip it so it won't take so long to get to. I think Obama actually said "bombs" with respect to Pearl Harbor - but he said it so softly that I'll have to admit - if you have your heart set on hearing a gaffe - that one will do.
The difference between these and Palin's gaffes is that Obama recognizes when he makes a mistake, and is confident enough to laugh at it - secure in the knowledge that he simply mis-spoke. Palin, on the other hand - is mystified with regard to what is wrong with the things she says and tries to support or 'explain' them - and in the process digs an ever deepening hole. One person we laugh with - the other we laugh at.
PS: I especially liked the "57 States - remix" that you didn't link - it was a bit long for my taste - but funny nonetheless.
Except they do not answer my question. Were any of ARCHON's examples character attacks? Were any of them mindlessly repeated talking points?
Try this. Announce your candidacy for the presidency. Try to keep up the pace that it requires for 18 months. Now try to never say something inaccurate or slightly stupid sounding in all of the unscripted moments that will happen in that time.
McCain couldn't do it. That's why he stopped talking candidly to the press. Palin was only on the trail a couple of months and was spouting nonsense and vitriol right out of the gate.
Archon Prime -- I didn't know social conservatives are comic book fanatics too. Do you talk politics at comicon too.
It's funny how the original comparison in the article is the comparison between the men and women running in the election yet no one has mention the wonderful tongue tripping of Biden. They all had them but I absolutely agree that Palin got crucified at every turn. Her statements weren't necessarily gaffes like Obama's and Biden's, more or less a misrepresentation of coherent sentences. At first I didn't feel bad for her, but now I do knowing what this election has done to her family, her reputation and career. How do you recover from that? She was the willing pawn of the GOP and probably had no idea what she was up against. We are all humans and make mistakes, yet it looks like we are going to make her pay for this one for years to come.
EJ -
I think if she goes back to Alaska and handles the several bad situations that she's facing there she'll do OK. Sure - she's had a hard time of it for the past several months but it got her into the spotlight. If she moves past being defensive, and takes this opportunity to better-educate herself and really learn her profession - then with her new knowledge and administrative experience she'll probably be a force to be reckoned with in the next election cycle - or perhaps the one after that. If she doesn't learn from this experience - and continues to blame everyone else for her missteps - then I think you're right - her career (at least, beyond Alaska) is probably over.
I tend to think she has a better opportunity facing her now than she did when she was picked as VP. It's now up to her to do something with it.
in the election yet no one has mention the wonderful tongue tripping of Biden. They all had them but I absolutely agree that Palin got crucified at every turn.
Agreed, and thanks for pointing out Biden's gaffe proness.
Typical Right-Wing Know-nothing response. "I won't answer your question, you answer mine"
You can't answer his question, because you're not informed enough.
I'm better informed than Obama and ANY of his supporters.
I guess I didn't stay with it long enough to catch the funny part - maybe someone should snip it so it won't take so long to get to.
O=genius says it in the first 11 seconds of the clip-Obama sees members of our FALLEN heroes in the audience today...He might see Veterans in the audience but he doesn't see any of the fallen Heroes....or do he?
I think Obama actually said "bombs" with respect to Pearl Harbor
Obama is quite clear about THE bomb that dropped on Pearl Harbor.
It's quite clear that Obama has no clue about Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima or American History outside of Chicago's Black Power race-politics set.
Obama recognizes when he makes a mistake
No, he doesn't. Obama recognizes HE'S BULLSH!TTING when he speaks. The Affirmative Action tap-dance for forgiving liberals is easy to recognize and easier to mock.
Laugh some more at the absolute LIES Obama tells:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjO8Qc5s1fY
The real answer is 9.
I didn't know social conservatives are comic book fanatics too. Do you talk politics at comicon too.
Do you talk comic books at political meetings? Do you know many social conservatives?
Were any of ARCHON's examples character attacks?
I didn't get to the "LIPSTICK ON A PIG" or "OLD SMELLY FISH" comments-those were blatant "character attacks.
Accusing the Republicans of using "race" was a character attack.
Pointing out Obama's friends are radicals and terrorists isn't a character attack-it's a character exposition.
Were any of them mindlessly repeated talking points?
Everything Obama said was a mindlessly repeated talking point.
Try this. Announce your candidacy for the presidency. Try to keep up the pace that it requires for 18 months. Now try to never say something inaccurate or slightly stupid sounding in all of the unscripted moments that will happen in that time.
Try doing it when you're an Affirmative Action half-wit with, oddly enough, ZERO RECORD of ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT or personal accomplishment...outside of "organizing" your neighborhood.
Yeah, it'll help if the media covers-up your every mistake while it attacks your enemies for you.
Palin was only on the trail a couple of months and was spouting nonsense and vitriol right out of the gate.
Palin was in the campaign for 9-weeks. What nonsense & vitriol was she spouting? Was it the truth about lord messiah Obama's pal Bill Ayers...yeah it was.
I'm better informed than Obama and ANY of his supporters
I'm afraid you're not.
Shaun - I'd still like to know, what do you think the press should have done to treat Palin more fairly? "Wardrobe-gate" was patently absurd, but people were claiming unequal treatment well before that.
I'm better informed than Obama and ANY of his supporters
I'm afraid you're not.
You're just afraid. Liberal. I understand.
I repeat, ANY of his supporters.
what do you think the press should have done to treat Palin more fairly?
They could have treated her like Obama, the pariahs' messiah.
sorry, having a valva doesnt automatically qualify one to be a world leader, and those who think that women will automatically flock to support another woman on the mere fact of shared gender are horribly mistaken.
The Press definitely gave Obama a major Pass. I am not sure why or what their agenda was/is.
I wonder what he will do, if the press suddenly turns on him?
It will be interesting to see how he handles negative press coverage. Is he tough enough?
But that's not what I asked. I asked what do you think was unfair about Palins coverage by the press and what could have been different?
I asked what do you think was unfair about Palins coverage by the press and what could have been different?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8&eurl=http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.member.html
Thank you for the link, Archon.
But what does it have to do with the fairness of the coverage of Palin?
I repeat, ANY of his supporters.
Absolutely no point in arguing someone who insults the masses and has a God-complex.
They were harder on Palin at first because no one knew anything about her. Then after a few interviews and such it was because she was so obviously in over her head. She made herself an easy target with her answers and unprofessional attitude. Gotta admit though - the Tina Skits were pretty funny.
Obama, is in over his head. You wait and see.
Anybody who has to follow what Bush did to this country is in way over their head. Bush made us a slave to China.
Shaun-
Of course he is in over his head...any President in office is going to be. The question should be who showed the best ability to get a handle on the issues and offer hopefully some fresh options. President-Elect Obama was the best choice. No one expects him to make problems disappear, but our hope is that he will provide the best opportunity to get a handle on it. Of all the candidates, he showed he would not panic, and would give thought to issues before making decisions. He won't be perfect, but as I said, he was the best choice.
Obama, is in over his head. You wait and see
Where have you been the last two years? He pulled this grassroots campaign out of his a$$ and kicked everyone's butt. He beat a senator has worked his whole life to be president. He beat Mrs. President--Hillary Clinton, the only woman who deserved to get as far as Palin did. The guy knows what he's doing.
Palin had the less qualified stardom that Obama also had. Obviously his qualifications trumped hers. And P.S. Many people who voted for McCain did not do it for Palin. They did it for either McCain alone, or for fear of Obama.
Bush made us a slave to China.
That was Bubba Clinton.
The guy knows what he's doing.
Having a complicit media & million$ in undisclosed illegal donor funds( middle east & george soros) and a population ignorant of the goals of Black Liberation Theology & Black Separatist Ideology sure helps.
Obama, is in over his head. You wait and see.
Don't count on me to provide him or his pals with a life-saver!
Good point, regarding being a slave to china, Archon.
Too many people are unaware of recent political history.
Here is a link that explains how little that average person knows about civics.
Excerpt:
Fully 71 percent of Americans flunked a 33-question civic-literacy survey conducted by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Among 2,508 respondents ISI randomly selected, 1,791 failed this test of U.S. historical, political, and economic basics. The average score was just 49 out of 100 — a solid F. While just 2.6 percent scored Bs on this quiz, only 0.8 percent earned As. ...
However, We the People closely follow popular culture here in the United States of American Idol. Only 21 percent of respondents correctly identified Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg address as the source of the words “government of the people, by the people, for the people.” But 56 percent properly named Paula Abdul as a judge on the karaoke sensation American Idol.
I took the test with Lis Whiel on the O'Reilly radio factor last Thursday. I got a 12 out of 14, and O'Reilly said those were the easy ones!!! :(
Archon I was just looking at this blog and saw many of your comments and it occured to me that you have some serious issues like "Little Mr Can't Be Wrong" I bet you have tendencies to see the best in people. Not! No you would rather argue for the sake of arguing and let me give you a clue people may listen to an opposing view at first if you have a specific point to make but once someone goes on and on attacking people your creditabiliy is gone......No one likes a know it all or at least someone who thinks that they know it all.....
No one likes a know it all or at least someone who thinks that they know it all.....
Woo hoo!
Let's see. I guess it's only sexist if she get's criticized. When all the right leaning talking heads (especially on Fox News) were referring to how good she looked (and making even cruder, clearly sexist comments), there wasn't a peep from people like you, SHAUNV.
And she was a bigger draw than McCain because she was new and everyone wanted to take a look at the new person. Also, if Clinton had spent $150,000 on her wardrobe or given such inane responses to simple questions, I get the feeling she would have been blasted just as much as Palin.
You mean you object to spending money.
What about the total $1.5 billion between all donated funds from all sources that Obama spent on his campaign? Money for sets that rivaled Britney spears sets, and paid to hold the DNC in two locations.
I guess you did not know about that money?
I like how you always seem to take the least meaningful point and harp on it, Shaun.
You mean you object to spending money
That doesn't even come close to what SpoxLogic was saying, and you clearly know it.
Let's see. I guess it's only sexist if she get's criticized. When all the right leaning talking heads (especially on Fox News) were referring to how good she looked (and making even cruder, clearly sexist comments), there wasn't a peep from people like you, SHAUNV.
Nothing on this, though. How.......you.
I guarantee that if any male presidential candidate or candidate for VEEPÂ who had been the mayor of a small town, then a state governor, had made some of the comments Palin made, he would have been crucified in the press. Remember Ross Perot?
Presidential politics is a tough business and people in the running have every single nuance and action scrutinized by the electron microscope of the press 24/7. Gaffes are immediately reported and reported and reported and reported for days on end. I'd just like to see what the press' reaction would have been to the statement that . . . "I can see Canada from my house" (the closest foreign country to Chicago) if it had been spoken by Obama. Palin spoke off the cuff and made mistakes. She got called on them. Perhaps next time out of the gate she'll do better. If not, she'll be a footnote in history books.
Obama thought there were 57 states
He's male. That statement did not hurt him?
how many total territories vote in presendential elections? Virgian Islands Puerto Rico DC.....
ShaunV
I guess if you can't win the argument you are having, you can just start a new argument! (My husband does that, and it drives me crazy) So lets argue about Obama and forget Palin, okay?
Yeahh...what he said!
Another kid in pajamas in the basement of their parent's house
Obama thought there were 57 states
He's male. That statement did not hurt him?
Obama is a "mixed-race" male; white guilt means you have to excuse his EVERY shortcoming.
and racism means that his "shortcomings" are his skin tones.
Obama is a "mixed-race" male; white guilt means you have to excuse his EVERY shortcoming
What is it called when McCain/Palin supporters support every one of their shortcomings?
I think many women want it both ways. They want to be 'indulged' in being whatever they feel they want to be; but 'pardoned' from some of the ethical and more gender-respectful conduct that men are held accountable for.
Good example is my own spouse. He works with women and thereby is not allowed to make certain comments that might be termed 'sexist'. He can't wink without seeming flirtatious and definitely can't tell sexist jokes without risk of making some woman upset. He can't make women embarrassed by words or comments; he probably can't make women cry without admonishment. But women can do all of that and so much more (and most assuredly do them in the workplace). Only difference? Women seem to not be held accountable to the same standards that men seemingly are.
Yeahh what she said!
Double yeah. As a professional woman, I go out of my way to minimize any hint of flirtation or sexuality. It's just not cool...
So, what gives with all of this hypersensitivity towards allowing women to have all that they think they want...for merely being a female?
We, as women, should realize that we *must* be better, stronger and more intelligent, if we truly expect to be at the top of the heap.
We, as women, should realize that we *must* be better, stronger and more intelligent, if we truly expect to be at the top of the heap.
Uhm, that's called a double standard, and that is exactly the issue that woman are complaining about. People should have equal opportunity to get to the top, base on the same criteria. Why should woman have to be better?
As for woman being able to wink at men in the workplace. I don't know what kind of company your husband works for, but that is considered unbusinesslike in all reputable firms.
How about winking when running for VP? Is that considered inappropriate?
Only if you are hung up on unimportant issues, instead of the actual issues.
"As for woman being able to wink at men in the workplace. I don't know what kind of company your husband works for, but that is considered unbusinesslike in all reputable firms."
You brought it up, I was just responding to YOUR statement.
Sorry, I never bring up "winking" I may address it, but I don't initiate the issue. Winking is not on my radar of relevant issues.
You might want to actually read my posts.
The sentence about women winking was copied from your post: it must have some significance to you. Like I said earlier, change the argument........
I don't think Shaun has ever been married B online, my wife is some one to be reckoned with! we are equal perhaps he's not familiar with the real 1st woman Lilith,not the Eve that the male dominated religious leaders.
B-online-Exactly. As a woman and a manager, I expect more out of my female employees because I know what women are capable of. And proving ourselves is the only to earn and keep respect. Winking and wearing short skirts is a way to get ridiculed..(see Sarah Palin)
So your saying that a man, who's wife was a high school drop out, who's teenage daughter was pregnant and a drop out, but wanted to insist on abstinence only, who believed that dinasaurs lived 6000 years ago, (in an oil state) who asked about how to go about removing books from a library, who had to attend 6 colleges to get a journalism degree, who raised the budgets in both city and state, taxed corporations to give more money in a hand out, who brought the most racists to his rally's, who wouldn't give an interview for weeks after selected and when he did, fumbled knowledge and the english language, who went to a speak in tongues church, had video of him promoting a seccessionist party, and video of a witch hunter laying on of hands, etc etc etc etc etc
That this man would not have been mocked ridiculed and laughed off the stage?
No she lasted pretty long considering.
Pretty much sums it up right there Blearc...
I don't trust anyone who is for banning books. Censorship really bugs me...actually SCARES me.
Actually, she did not ban books.
You might want to check your facts, lest you give credence to the Zogby poll showing that Obama supporters are uninformed.
Actually Shaun try reading what I said was:
who asked about how to go about removing books from a library,
If I would have said she banned books you would be correct, the point is her intention to limit freedoms.
The librarian basically told her, you can pull it out of my cold dead hands. But what about the rest of the list Shaun? Any other untruths you want to try to find?
That's what I meant to say, she had the intentions...
I type faster than I think sometimes. Her intention to limit freedoms is what scares me about her, and about many of these neo-cons.
Bar Fly - you had it right the first time she is clearly for banning books. The question she asked the librarian had a clear motive. She never did it because it was never feasible.
Shaun, why even continue the left/right debate over Palin?
You're doing exactly what the media does, getting readers based on some assumed controversy regarding her.
Shouldn't you be focused on Bobby Jindil for 2012?
Thank you for the post, ShaunV!
I actually like Sarah Palin. She's entertaining to me. I don't, however, believe that she was treated unfairly. The media covered her on the campaign trail more than the others because she was so new to everyone. If it was perceived by some that the treatment of her was sexist, then it was her own doing.
I was "bashed" for speaking out about her right after it was announced that her teenage daughter was pregnant. I said I thought she should not have accepted the nomination, because it was clear to me that her children might need her more than the rest of the country and that I thought she made a selfish decision. I still believe that and I always will, because children need their mothers. I have nothing against working mothers, as I have always been a full-time working mother. Sarah isn't special in that regard.
I suppose my comments and beliefs are archaic, but it's how I feel. Just because Sarah is a woman, doesn't make her any different than any other candidate, and I don't think she was treated differently because she was a woman, I think she may have been perceived differently because people like me can't comprehend how a person could expose their family to the media scrutiny for a job.
Cheers!
Gee, I wonder if Palin being clueless and demonstrating a real lack of information on basic issues had anything to do with the kind of coverage that she got?? Ya think?
I can't believe people would even compare Palin to Hillary. Palin is a complete idiot. She should have never been considered for VP. She should run back to Alaka and stay there and be thankful that Alaskan's don't care that she is stupid. If she wants to come onto the National stage again she better get an education first. Maybe the republican party can get her a student loan.
I think Palin is smart in the way that Jessica Simpson is smart. She has zero book knowledge, but somehow amassed enough street smarts to know how to make people follow her around like a puppy.
I agree:
"I think Palin is smart in the way that Jessica Simpson is smart"
Just because she remembers to put on her panties...she get 10 points. Although I think Palin knows more about TUNA...lmao She doesn't know much about turkeys tho.
The media has been scrutinizing Hilary Clinton for 16yrs. During the Democratic primaries, most media outlets (the evil mainstream people) were less than fair to her, overall. The main difference between Clinton and Palin? Clinton has grown the politician's thick skin which allows one to push through regardless of criticism. Although Palin has been in the public eye within Alaska for some years, she has, yet, to develop the hard shell for Washington style exposure. That is what the Republicans should be working on with her. The key to a successful political career....move on.
Hope Palin reads the Constitution and other pertinent materials in the meantime as she thickens her skin.... as opposed to thickening her head which she apparently has been working on for some time!!!
Poor Palin was blessed with less than stellar intelligence and an inability to think on her feet. I don't think judgement on her has anything to do with her sex. She just wanted her time in the spotlight without considering that she was not up to the task at hand. The conservatives were brainwashed into following her, and poor McCain paid the price. Prove I am wrong.
Oh Kj0 there ya go again, dontcha know!
Sorry, sometimes my innerchild comes out to play.
Harsher on Palin than Hillary? Because of sexism?!
Last I knew they were both of the same gender. I don't get it.
Yeah, it's just like the racism card being played all over the place. No one really knows what these things mean.
Did anyone look at the poll?? 65% thought SNL's treatment of Palin was fair. LOL
That's because so much of it was word for word of what Palin said. They didn't have to really write much material, it was all laid out for them.
BUWAHAHA!!
Man-up Shawn you lost- big time
The reason? Your boy Bush of course. That and Obama's clear superiority over McCain/
Palin was the rock the GOP tied to John's leg
The reason? Your boy Bush of course. That and Obama's clear superiority over McCain/
Jimster:
Your boastful poast is so junior high school.
I bet you can spit farther than palin, too. I bet your spit can reach Russia.
Your boastful poast is so junior high school.
as you say....
I bet you can spit farther than palin, too. I bet your spit can reach Russia
You shouldn't judge the comments of others Shaun, your comments are getting very childish and very "because I said so"
Uhm, that's the point, Mars.
It's called an "example"
Should I spell it for you.
Should I spell it for you.
Nah, I don't think you could, plus I don't want to stress you out on such a busy day of fabricating bull@!$%#.
amen to that Mars.
Tsk...tsk...tsk. Put my comment back, Shaun. Or delete a bunch of your own. Don't like getting slapped with your own hypocrisy? I guess I don't blame ya.
Your boastful poast is so junior high school.
Sorry to over shoot Shaun.
You'll understand when you get there.
I see you are stuck in junior high school time warp, jimster. Cute.
But Shaun,
Obama thought there was 57 states, so you must be wrong.
Well I voted nader. ANd yes the media was out to get Palin and McCain.
Hell they barely even looked at Obama and Biden.
Ok waiting for the Obama supporters to start bashing. which is typical now days COnform Or leave etc etc
Ok waiting for the Obama supporters to start bashing. which is typical now days.
Agreed.
Well I voted nader. ANd yes the media was out to get Palin and McCain
Sorry, man, but the burden of proof here is not on us, it's on you. I'm not going to spend my time refuting something you would discount anyway. You bring me some evidence and I will gladly consider it. Your perception of the media covering all things McCain/Palin does not a biased media make.
Palin failed because she was unprepared, not because of her gender, if she is so great we will have to see if she can pull herself out of the hole made by her, her handlers and the republican party.
There is a lot of sexism on TV, Sex in the city, lipstick jungle and other shows that suggest many woman are shallow and just worry about what to wear and who to date. TV is a house of mirrors that does not represent a large part of our population. But hey, what do I know, I'm just a guy who is tired of seeing BARBIE and JUNE CLEAVER as the only representations of woman on TV.
Palin failed because she is not educated. In my city, I could not get elected to the County Commissioners office with her education. Maybe we just have a higher bar for County Commissioner than for VP.
Another ShaunV thread: Let me down a packet of Sweet N' Low to cut through the bitterness.
blah, blah, ....just wait Obama will be terrible.
blah, blah, ....Sarah Palin was mistreated by the media.
yadda, yadda, yadda, Shaun. You should be proud of your country for noticing the empty message and divisive tactics of the McCain/Palin campaign and saying NO! Putting a great exclamation point on Rovian GOP fear tactics.
Pat yourself on the back, Shaun. Take pride in the smart choice your fellow Americans have made.
you deserve more checks, but i can only vote once.
Sarah Palin doesn't even know what a "feminist" is. Yet she called herself one, in the same sentence where she blew it by admitting she didn't know the meaning of the word. I watched the interview.
Secondly, who would seriously compare Hillary Clinton to Sarah Palin? What a bloody insult to Hillary.
They share one thing in common, and it ain't brains or experience. Please, get real. Are we electing genitals? Good looks? We have in the past, and any American whom casts a vote for the best looking, or on the basis of sex, should not be voting. How about if I vote for Barney because he's cute? Oh, I think he's purple. That wouldn't work, because purple is so..........gay! Bloody hell. Americans need to use their brains more often when election time rolls around.
Thank God Obama won. I voted for his brains, and his vision.
LOL yeah! She said:
"I consider myself a Feminist... whatever that means..." LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Ann,
I can't stop laughing. She also said she didn't know what the job of VP was either. And we should have given it to her? Pa-leese !
Well that is not any worse than what Obama said:
Excerpt from the LA times.
"It is wonderful to be back in Oregon," Obama said. "Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it."
The Times' conscientious Robin Abcarian thought she heard something different there. She checked her tape recorder. It had captured what he had actually said -- 57 states now. A new Louisiana Purchase that's gone unannounced so far? Was he channeling his inner John Kerry-Heinz 57 personality?
(UPDATE: At a later stop Obama was talking with reporters and expressed concern he'd also mis-stated the number of potential cyclone victims in Burma. He said, ""I hope I said 100,000 people the first time instead of 100 million. I understand I said there were 57 states today. It's a sign that my numeracy is getting a little, uh." At that point, an aide cut him off and ushered journalists out. Before he could mis-speak again?)
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/05/barack-obama-wa.html
so what, do you actually beleive that he thinks there are 57 states?
I think that is the question to ask. He graduated from Columbia...Then Harvard...
Palin has said some humdingers that are far worse than this, you betcha!
She is a joke! and a bad one at that.
Hijacking your own thread, Shaun? Why don't you post that two or three more times. Maybe then you'll feel better.
But Shaun, Palin said that she is a feminist and that she doesn't know what that means in the same sentence! She also said Africa was a country and South Africa was a region. She also can't name anything she reads. She also says "also too because..." and "Mavrick" . She also too said that she doesn't know what the VP does. Also too, don't ya know, she said that God tells her what to do politically. You betcha she also said that cities are not part of "Real America".
Shaun,
"57 states" is clearly your only argument. Obama had traveled the country and was exhausted. What is Sarah's excuse for not knowing anything she was asked. She needs to be educated before she opens her mouth.
Changing the argument again,ShaunV??? You need to stay on topic. The article was about Palin.
Again!
“There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.”
~Goethe~
A+
Well, my A+ comment was for snwodttam's comment. But it was apparently so good that it was deleted.
It is hard being that good, GrayHouse! :D
A new poll has now confirmed the findings of the previous poll, so all is not lost!
"57 states" is clearly your only argument
Seriously. Enough already. If you think Obama really thinks there are 57 states, you have some serious introspection to do.
this thread has given me quite a few chuckles - i am not laughing because Palin is a woman - i am laughing because she made a fool of herself - she was not prepared to go out into the world but she still went - she ranted at us about working moms being home for their kids & what was she doing while her daughter got knocked up? -
I know, she is a bad joke!
Entertaining...
and that is what the problem is and was - she was a joke - no one could take her seriously - at least i couldn't - she never discussed issues - no issues at all - and that damn thumbs up & 'soccer mom' reference - ugh - she was a poster child for dragging women back into the 50s
I'm laughing more at shaun, he seeded this and can't keepup or ahead. Terrible to be so far behind.
I live in the middle of Missouri if I go to the top of the next hill I can see Illinois therefore I am an expert of Illinois. Right?
right...lol :)
maybe you can build a bridge from the hill to Illinois, then you can be a DOT expert too.
LOL. Keep an eye out for Putin. He has a vacation home in Belleville!
Next time you go outside at night debmo, catch a look at the moon. It'll make you an expert rocket scientist and an astronaut.
Dang guys you got me beat. I live in the middle of an Army base. I can see Iraq from here. :)
Hello! ShaunV ANY RESPONSE?
Obama said "57 states!"
Obama said "57 states!"
He misspoke one time! Lets crucify him!
Please, if Palin had only misspoke one time, then maybe they would have been kinder to her. The media loved her until Katie Couric. She did this to herself. Very nice try though!!!
You do realize that Obama is quoted as stating that there are 57 states?
Where? Was it on news or in writing? I dont recall it.
He misspoke one time! Lets crucify him!
Even if he did misspoke this saying I would like to see it.
Also, I'm was for McCain but before that I was for Clintion. So guess which if I liked her or Sarah.
Even if he did misspoke this saying I would like to see it.
Also, I'm was for McCain but before that I was for Clintion. So guess which if I liked her or Sarah.
I can't... I won't... I want to, so much. I'll be nice.
Palin=woman
Clinton=woman
Sexist? I don't get it.
Palin=dumb
Clinton=smart
Now, I get it.
News bulletin: No matter how many states Barack Obama can be quoted as the US having in a singular mis-statement...he is now president elect of ALL OF THEM.
As for the sexism against Palin...Hillary has had all the similar, except that she has an intellect and a record to back herself up. Comparing the two is like asking why an apple can't produce orange juice. One was/is prepared to serve this country as a leader, the other needs a civics lesson to understand the job she was applying for.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |